Uttar Pradesh govt objects to minister’s son’s bail plea in Supreme Court – Flying Journals

UP govt objects to federal minister Ajay Kumar Mishra’s son’s bail plea in Supreme Court

New Delhi:

The Uttar Pradesh government today challenged the bail plea of ​​the son of Union Minister Ajay Kumar Mishra, one of the defendants in the Lakhimpur Kheri violence case, in the Supreme Court.

Uttar Pradesh Deputy Attorney-General Garima Prashad told the bench of Judge Surya Kant and Judge JK Maheshwari that the offense was serious.

“This is a serious and heinous crime and (granting bail) would send the wrong signal to society,” she said after being asked by the court what her reasons were for opposing the bail request.

The Supreme Court said there were two versions of the serious and heinous crime and it could not comment on either.

“Our preliminary view is that he was involved, that he was the accused and not innocent. Is it the state’s case that he tried to destroy evidence?” the bench asked.

To this, the Deputy Attorney-General replied, “It hasn’t happened until now.” Senior defense lawyer Dushyant Dave, who represented those who opposed the bail request, said granting bail would send a dire message to society. “It was a murder case of conspiracy and orchestration. I will prove from the charge sheet that … he is the son of a powerful man, represented by a powerful lawyer,” he said.

Mukul Rohaj, a senior lawyer appearing for Misra, strongly objected to Dave’s submission, saying: “What is this? Who has power? We are in court every day. Can this be a non-bail condition? Rohatgi said his client has been in custody for more than a year and would take seven to eight years to complete under the current format of the trial. He said that the complainant in the case, Jagjit Singh, was not an eyewitness and his complaint was based on hearsay.

“Jagjit Singh is the complainant, he is not a witness. I am surprised that the FIR is registered on the non-witness version when there are many people saying that we run over people mercilessly?” he said.

“My client was granted bail at the outset. This is not a chicken and cow story, my story is true,” Rohatgi said, adding that his client was not a criminal and had no past record.

A hearing on the matter is ongoing.

Eight people were killed in Tikunia, Lakhimpur Kheri district, on October 3, 2021, as farmers protested against then-Uttar Pradesh Deputy Chief Minister Keshav Prasad Maurya’s visit to the area.

According to Uttar Pradesh Police FIR, four farmers were hit by an SUV with Ashish Mishra sitting inside. Following the incident, a driver and two BJP workers were allegedly lynched by angry farmers. A journalist was also killed in the violence.

On December 6 last year, the trial court indicted Ashish Mishra and 12 others on charges of murder, conspiracy to commit crimes and more in connection with a protest against the death of farmers in Lakhimpur Kheri, paving the way for the war to begin. the way. trial.

A total of 13 defendants, including Ashish Mishra, were charged under IPC sections 147 and 148 with rioting, 149 (unlawful assembly), 302 (murder), 307 (attempted murder), 326 (voluntary use of a dangerous weapon to cause serious injury) or means ), 427 (mischief) and 120B (punishment for criminal conspiracy), and Section 177 of the Motor Vehicle Act.

The other 12 accused are Ankit Das, Nandan Singh Bisht, Latif Kale, Satyam alias Satya Prakash Tripathi, Shekhar Bharti, Sumit Jaiswal, Ashish Pandey, Lavkush Rana, Shishu Pal, Ullas Kumar alias Mohit Trivedi, Rinku Rana and Dharmendra Banjara. They are all in prison.

When the matter was heard on December 12 last year, the Supreme Court had asked the state government to submit a report on the murder of the SUV’s three passengers.

(Aside from the title, this story is unedited by NDTV staff and published via a syndicated feed.)

Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *